Home | Register | Login | Members  

David Lynch > Inland Empire: Volume II
New Topic | Post Reply
<< | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | >>  
151. Thursday, October 5, 2006 9:12 PM
Annie RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:1124

 View Profile
 Send PM

Enough movie festivals already--just release the damn movie! (And those Indie people can't even spell INLAND EMPIRE correctly, either!)

Tired of waiting...


Keep your eye on the doughnut, not on the hole -- DL

 
152. Thursday, October 5, 2006 1:02 AM
YmSeb RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 12/20/2005
 Posts:103

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:This makes that November wide release unlikely... Oh well. I never really thought that was gonna happen anyway.


Indeed, it could not happen for November. Movies planning are done weeks and weeks in advance, like CD's or DVD's, simply to let time to distribution companies to organize the promotion surrounding the release.

And as Salon.com reports, "It has not yet been acquired for U.S. distribution".

December is the month of the biggest blockbusters, so don't have any hopes now for 2006. Between the announcement of the release date and the release date it self, there is always AT LEAST 3 months, so you do the maths... 

 
153. Thursday, October 5, 2006 6:29 PM
Laura was a patient of mine RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 3/15/2006
 Posts:690

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE: December is the month of the biggest blockbusters, so don't have any hopes now for 2006. Between the announcement of the release date and the release date it self, there is always AT LEAST 3 months, so you do the maths... 

Just in time for my birthday! Please...
 

 


That god damn trailer's more popular than Uncle's Day in a whorehouse!

 
154. Thursday, October 5, 2006 9:17 PM
Annie RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:1124

 View Profile
 Send PM

Well, I just wanted to say "Good bye and Have Fun!!!" to the folks in here who will be at the NYFF.  Noah seems to be busting out all over.  And I got somebody in LJ to sell my co-mod at TwinPeaksFan their tickets!!!  So I'm happy too.  (No travel, he lives in downtown Manhattan--could life get much better?!)

Have a great time, guys (which makes me wonder why do I only hear about guys going?)  Susan?


Keep your eye on the doughnut, not on the hole -- DL

 
155. Friday, October 6, 2006 1:52 AM
RazorBlade RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 9/10/2006
 Posts:94

 View Profile
 Send PM
I too want to say "have a good 'un" at NYFF. Is there any word on IE playing other film festivals?


We kissed Buffy. I may be love's bitch but I'm man enough to admit it.
 
156. Saturday, October 7, 2006 10:51 PM
Annie RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:1124

 View Profile
 Send PM
See post 161, for the Los Angeles International Film Festival; I hope these festivals stop and it starts playing in theaters soon!  Like BEFORE Christmas!  That would be a gift.


Keep your eye on the doughnut, not on the hole -- DL

 
157. Sunday, October 8, 2006 6:00 AM
BOB1 RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 12/25/2005
 Posts:2908

 View Profile
 Send PM

I don't like reading reviews of things I haven't seen so I didn't really look any closer into them.... except for iar's report from Venice, that was fascinating! :-)))

A dream come true, right? I admire the passion, really do!

The film will most certainly come to cinemas in Poland as it is closely linked with my country - I see they treat it over here as some kind of promotion of the country, they say Lynch has said many warm words about the Polish crew who worked with him on the film?

As Lynch has had many dealings with the Camerimage festival, it is predicted that perhaps it will have its Polish premiere at that festival, too (that'd be pretty soon, this autumn). To the regular cinemas we expect it to come at the beginning of next year.

I am not interested in watching it in any other way than cinema! :-)


Bobi 1 Kenobi

B. Beware
O. Of
B. BOB
 

 
158. Monday, October 9, 2006 1:41 AM
Montana RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 1/16/2006
 Posts:301

 View Profile
 Send PM

Well, that definitely sounds like the sort DL film I want to see. I knew some of the carping reviewers were wrong but reassures me that someone who knows about DL has given IE such a positive response.

BTW, I know most titles are given on what appears at the begining of the film's opening credits but with typo quirkiness, why don't we get no caps titles and all caps titles and similar oddities? I assume people just deduce a workable rendering and use that regardless of what the film says.

Personally, I am not so keen on "INLAND EMPIRE". It is a little like someone who only types in caps, a bit nutty. It isn't anyone's place to say whether it matters or not to DL but...

Monty

 
159. Monday, October 9, 2006 2:35 AM
BOB1 RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 12/25/2005
 Posts:2908

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:
one of the more horrific and nightmarish things I've ever seen. This is the Lynch of Eraserhead, reborn in DV.

ha, I wonder what that means for you ;-)

People have different things in mind when they say "horrible" (that's what you meant I suppose, not horrific?) and "nightmarish" - for me the absolutely most nightmarish was Lost Highway in terms of that it made me frightened, on the other hand Eraserhead was the one film which had the most nightmare-like structure.

Anyway, both associations look encouraging ;-)
 


Bobi 1 Kenobi

B. Beware
O. Of
B. BOB
 

 
160. Monday, October 9, 2006 3:53 AM
iar RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 7/11/2006
 Posts:86

 View Profile
 Send PM

BOB1 - Thankyou for your nice words about my over-excited post of last month! And RE. the nightmarish feel of IE...I think that its nightmarish in both the ways that you just described. It has a nightmarish structure (for sure) and it scared the living crap out of me in parts. There is especially one part that springs to mind where I actually jumped..and i NEVER EVER do that in a cinema!

Its relentlessly (spelling?!) dark and such hard work. Don't go and see this if youre looking for a nice bit of entertainment...this is hard work! Yes, most Lynch films are...but this is even more relentless. There is hardly space to breath. To me it felt like I was being dragged along on a journey which I was petrifying yet seductive and that I didnt have a second to breath or pause for thought...it just kept dragging you on and on and on. I find it amazing how Mr Lynch has this talent to make an audience feel so uncomfortable. The most interesting thing is that there are scenes in which you have the urge to laugh...and yet you don't know whether you should. I could feel the rest of the audience thinking the same...and then maybe youll get a small titter of laughter...nervous laughter...and then silence again. From the reviews Ive seen, it seems that every different audience laughs in different places. The one review that compared this to the canned laughter in Rabbits was incredibly interesting and makes me believe even more firmly that one of the messages/raison d'etre of this film (other than it's pure creative originality and brilliance) is it's comment on TV/Film/Media and our reaction as an audience to it.

 
161. Monday, October 9, 2006 6:35 AM
Booth RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 8/20/2006
 Posts:4388

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

Personally, I am not so keen on "INLAND EMPIRE". It is a little like someone who only types in caps, a bit nutty. It isn't anyone's place to say whether it matters or not to DL but...


You haven't seen the DL.com chat logs, have you?

 
162. Monday, October 9, 2006 8:55 AM
PaleThinMan RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 7/19/2006
 Posts:49

 View Profile
 Send PM

 I don't know if this was posted yet but this review is amazing.

 

Contains few spoilers. 

 

Inland Empire

By Leo Goldsmith, notcoming.com, October 5, 2006

An actress and a new role. Marriage and infidelity. An unpaid bill. TV and the movies. A sitcom about rabbits. An old tale and its variation; an old film and its remake. Prostitutes. A star is born, re-born, half-born. Today, two days from now, yesterday. Brutal fucking murder. The Locomotion. “This is the kind of shit I’m talking about.”

The initial viewing of a new David Lynch film poses some obvious problems. Faced with a torrent of non sequiturs, frame tales, and multiple planes of reality and consciousness, the viewer strives in vain to assemble the disparate fragments into a singular, coherent whole, one that the Lynch-savvy viewer knows will only become apparent after much hindsight and many future viewings, if at all.

This is particularly, audaciously true in the case of Inland Empire, a film that, like Eraserhead, Lynch shot piecemeal over the span of a few years. He started production on the film as early as 2001, shooting the “Rabbits” sitcom right after (and with some cast members of) Mulholland Drive, and completed it in Poland as late as January of this year. Largely bankrolling the production of the film himself, Lynch purportedly would wait for inspiration to write and shoot scenes that he would later shoehorn into the whole. In this way, the task of the spectator becomes similar to that of the filmmaker, assembling peculiar, seemingly unrelated elements into coherence over a long duration.

Inland Empire leads us down pathways, through doorways, along currents, impulses, grooves, and trains of thought, and we are left to scramble for and create our own meaning, to wonder at the significance of letters scratched on walls or written on the protagonist’s hand, to piece together tentative chronologies, to parse real-life from the movies, and, above all, to strive for the proper reaction — horror or hilarity. In the screening I attended, peals of laughter accompanied an expletive-peppered monologue in which one of Laura Dern’s characters relates a tale about gouging out the eye and clawing the genitals of a potential rapist. But this laughter was as much a result of helplessness as it was of giddy bewilderment. It was the laughter of mild derision on the one hand, and of discomfort on the other, uncertain about where the artifice ends and the real “brutal fucking murder” begins. The audience’s reaction is therefore somewhat like that of the laugh-track in Lynch’s already-mythical family sitcom, bursting intermittently and inappropriately from off-camera while rabbit-headed characters speak in mixed-up dialogue, reference undisclosed sequence, and iron clothing monotonously.

In Inland Empire, more than ever, Lynch wishes to establish a connection between a world that is astonishingly familiar and deceptively immediate and one that is utterly, horribly alien. And, more than ever, these two worlds are interchangeable, like prostitutes and starlets, actors and their roles. This is to say also that Lynch wishes to implicate us in his film, not only as observers, but as participants. As in any film, we receive signs and images that purportedly fit together, but here Lynch gives us the sole responsibility of assembling them into a pattern of meaning. In Inland Empire, the spectator is also interchangeable with the characters and the actors playing them.

The most aggressive means of drawing in the viewer that Lynch has at his disposal is ironically the most immediately repellent. Lynch’s use of digital video in the film has already been the source of much head-scratching in early reviews and festival reports; many have wondered, rather petulantly, why the director of such crystalline, defined celluloid images as those in Blue Velvet and Mulholland Drive — vibrant, striking images of deep red curtains and lipstick, clear blue fluorescence, and impenetrable blackness — should opt in his new film for the gritty, fuzzy, and amorphous quality of DV. Indeed, Lynch has not simply jettisoned celluloid, he has completely negated it, choosing to shoot on a Sony PD-150, a relatively lower grade digital format, that when projected, jolts the image into life with thousands of tiny, wriggling pixels. Scenes shot in near-darkness, of which there are many, are swimming with surface interference as though Lynch is not so much interested in what he is shooting as intent on conveying the thick smog of the Inland Empire or the very skin of the video itself. What appears onscreen is thus consistently ugly and endlessly fascinating, lending texture and noise to every object in the frame and applying great, unflattering splotches of rouge and green pallor to every face in close-up.

What Lynch demands of his viewers is therefore not only a narratological muscularity, but also a visual acuity of Brakhagian proportions. As a cinematic stylist, he has always been interested in testing the viewer’s vision, through violent focusing and re-focusing, jerky camera movement, and stroboscopic lighting, as well as its hearing, with indecipherable and even inaudible dialogue, shocking waves of electronic noise, and unidentified, disembodied voices and sounds. All of these figure in Inland Empire, but they are extended and completed by the full, nasty force of the DV that Lynch brings to bear on his film. Few directors have attempted to probe, even transgress the boundaries of technology and visuality as Lynch does here, and even those who have — like Sokurov in last year’s The Sun — have seldom done so in such an aggressive and systematic manner. As with the scattered splinters of plot and mood, the film almost demands that one assemble the individual pixels onscreen, squirming like snow on a television or ants on a severed ear, into a clear, bright image.

Late in the film, one of Laura Dern’s characters likens her situation to that of a spectator in a movie theater, watching things happening on the screen in front of her without being able to change or participate in them. She eventually finds herself there, watching herself onscreen as things happen around her, and we are of course right there with her. And if we don’t exactly gain agency in the film, Lynch accords us a space of great mental, sensual, and critical creativity, replaying and circulating images clues and streams of thought. Like the characters in the film, or the actors performing it, we relive these moments over and over again until we get them straight.

 

 


 
163. Monday, October 9, 2006 1:50 PM
BOB1 RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 12/25/2005
 Posts:2908

 View Profile
 Send PM

A very interesting review! VERY well written. And encouraging, at least for me.

I wouldn't say there are any particlar spoilers, though. This kind of information cannot really spoil anything, can it??


Bobi 1 Kenobi

B. Beware
O. Of
B. BOB
 

 
164. Monday, October 9, 2006 2:50 PM
Rabid Muse RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 6/6/2006
 Posts:105

 View Profile
 Send PM

NEWS FLASH:

(at least to me)

A couple of days ago, at the NYFF Dave said he is NOT familiar with Bunuel.

Cool. That ought to silence a few out there. (not here on these boards, but elsewhere).


"Every day is a Saturday morning." -DL
 
165. Monday, October 9, 2006 5:53 PM
PaleThinMan RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 7/19/2006
 Posts:49

 View Profile
 Send PM

 

 

http://comingsoon.net/news/indietopnews.php?id=16889

 

Huge smile on my face as soon as I read this !


 
166. Monday, October 9, 2006 3:48 PM
B RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:1263

 View Profile
 Send PM

 

 


-B
 
167. Monday, October 9, 2006 4:13 PM
Booth RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 8/20/2006
 Posts:4388

 View Profile
 Send PM
CHUD.com review

 
168. Monday, October 9, 2006 4:43 PM
ig0r RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 1/25/2006
 Posts:208

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

NEWS FLASH:

(at least to me)

A couple of days ago, at the NYFF Dave said he is NOT familiar with Bunuel.

Cool. That ought to silence a few out there. (not here on these boards, but elsewhere).

yes he is. blue velvet interview.

 
169. Monday, October 9, 2006 5:58 PM
Rabid Muse RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 6/6/2006
 Posts:105

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:
QUOTE:

NEWS FLASH:

(at least to me)

A couple of days ago, at the NYFF Dave said he is NOT familiar with Bunuel.

Cool. That ought to silence a few out there. (not here on these boards, but elsewhere).

yes he is. blue velvet interview.


QUOTING David Lynch from just a couple of days ago:

"...a lot of people talk about Bunuel, and I am really not familiar with Bunuel's films..."

He was speaking English and this is what I heard him say ...LOL.


"Every day is a Saturday morning." -DL
 
170. Monday, October 9, 2006 6:51 PM
Laura was a patient of mine RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 3/15/2006
 Posts:690

 View Profile
 Send PM

Oh God... Lynch is going to distribute the film himself... in a unique way apparently. Worst news I've heard all week.


That god damn trailer's more popular than Uncle's Day in a whorehouse!

 
171. Monday, October 9, 2006 7:34 PM
PaleThinMan RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 7/19/2006
 Posts:49

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

Oh God... Lynch is going to distribute the film himself... in a unique way apparently. Worst news I've heard all week.

David even said it himself that this is meant to be seen in theaters. Its not like he would release it off the web site or something.


 
172. Monday, October 9, 2006 10:53 PM
MrsTremond RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 12/20/2005
 Posts:171

 View Profile
 Send PM

Just got back from the Festival tonight.

WOW. Not only did I see what, I feel, is the best work Lynch has ever done, but I was even treated to the presence of Lynch, Theroux, and Dern.

I will be working on a review, which I will post on another site, but let me just say that INLAND EMPIRE is a cross between the nightmarishness of Eraserhead, the voluptousness of Mulholland Drive, and the darkness of Lost Highway. It is impossible to  understand the movie from just one sitting, but understanding is not the key. Feeling is the key. Or, as Lynch said this morning, the IDEAS. The movie is a dark labyrinth that spirals in on itself, represented by the opening shot of a 45 vinyl.  But this spiraling in also expands. The movie oppresses you to the point where you are freed - meaning, as one gets accustomed to the work, the disjointedness and feeling of being lost liberates you to the point where you can go anywhere - which is precisely what Dern's character does.

I agree with you IAR, the ending credit sequence was WONDERFUL. Possibly the happiest scene Lynch has ever directed.

Anyone of you who've seen the film and want to discuss details and specifics (I'd LOVE to), you can IM met at EveningAbsurdity or email me at nlyons09@wooster.edu


This would look good on your wall.

-Noah- 

 
173. Tuesday, October 10, 2006 12:07 AM
Annie RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:1124

 View Profile
 Send PM

Sounds like you really enjoyed yourself, Noah!  Please post that review on two other sites!  And, aren't reviews allowed here?  I'd love to hear about your trip in NYC, too. 

Did David say what it meant by him being in charge of the release of the movie--as in when will it be happening?


Keep your eye on the doughnut, not on the hole -- DL

 
174. Tuesday, October 10, 2006 7:49 AM
Rabid Muse RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 6/6/2006
 Posts:105

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

Just got back from the Festival tonight.

WOW. Not only did I see what, I feel, is the best work Lynch has ever done, but I was even treated to the presence of Lynch, Theroux, and Dern.


Yay! Unforgettable experience, yes?


"Every day is a Saturday morning." -DL
 
175. Tuesday, October 10, 2006 10:25 AM
ThisIsTheGirl RE: Inland Empire: Volume II


 Member Since
 1/27/2006
 Posts:373

 View Profile
 Send PM

More reports from the screening a couple of nights ago are starting to come in. I really like this one, from Patrick Meaney:

http://thoughtsonstuff.blogspot.com/2006/10/inland-empire-no-spoilers.html

....because it is spoiler-free, and even better, Patrick claims that during the Q & A, he asked Lynch about both the Season 2 DVDs and the FWWM deleted scenes -and Lynch told him that both were on their way!

 Very cool news, if it's true!

TITG


Has he taken his eyes off it yet?

 

New Topic | Post Reply Page 7 of 19 :: << | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | >>
David Lynch > Inland Empire: Volume II


Users viewing this Topic (1)
1 Guest


This page was generated in 406 ms.