Home | Register | Login | Members  

Twin Peaks & FWWM > What if they had decided not to reveal laura's killer?
New Topic | Post Reply
<< | 1 | >>  
1. Monday, January 18, 2010 2:05 PM
Bryan Blanton What if they had decided not to reveal laura's killer?


 Member Since
 9/23/2009
 Posts:30

 View Profile
 Send PM

I know this has probably been talked about on here before and if so i'm sorry to start another topic about it.

 I've heard the writers and people who ran the show lynch and frost were pressured by abc to reveal who laura's killer was. I've also heard 1 reason abc wanted it revealed was becasue ratings were dropping - some people were not watching it because of their impatience to find out who killed laura?

If they had decided not to reveal who killed laura could twin peaks have had more than 2 seasons could they have had 3 or more.

 Also i heard from some people abc wanted them to add or have them turn the show somewhat into like a soap opera or something like that?

 

 
2. Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:14 AM
12rainbow RE: What if they had decided not to reveal laura's killer?


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:4953

 View Profile
 Send PM

Bryan- please don't apologize for starting a new topic.  It's an old show, the only novel thing going for it is revisiting topics here!

 

 The combo of playing musical time slots, David Lynch and others wanting to explore other creative ground, and a general waning of public interest when these things started happening after Season 1 led to the death of the show.

 

Whatever point Peaks stopped being David's primary focus what, I believe (so do many cast members), was the downfall, was more the end than revealing the killer.  I doubt revealing the killer was the beginning and end of David's frustration with working under network restrictions, although it must have played a part...  the network said the killer had to be revealed. There was no way around it.  We like to think 'what if' but, in the words of Donna Hayward, "Maybe the sun won't come up tomorrow if you wash your hair. Keep thinking like that and you'll go crazy."  It was not a logical possiiblility, what with vested interests and the necessities of creating a satisfying narrative structure.

Besides- The killer was known from the get-go, and the clues were there even in the pilot, and in the Diary (Jen dropped deliberate clues, as she said on Good Morning America, after David and Mark told her whodunit) If you look at it that way, the killer was being revealed, inevitably, at a steady pace.  Without Leland's extreme behavior in place, TP would not be the show it is!

The show, as a high-quality prime time serial, just did not have longevity.  It was expensive, the writing started slipping...   It set the bar too high in the beginning, I think, and bridged too many TV genres.   Daytime serials set the bar low.  Prime time crime dramas and supernatural stories were self-contained and didn't require close, loyal viewership. (Regrettably, these formulas allows for series that go on and on and on....) TP was the most amazing, engaging thing people had seen on TV, and demanded they keep tuning in.

The hottest fires burn out fastest.

 
3. Monday, January 18, 2010 4:58 PM
wizardofxenia RE: What if they had decided not to reveal laura's killer?


 Member Since
 7/7/2009
 Posts:334

 View Profile
 Send PM
indeed


There was a fiish..iinn the percolatrr!

 
4. Monday, January 18, 2010 6:54 PM
JFK RE: What if they had decided not to reveal laura's killer?


 Member Since
 5/5/2007
 Posts:562

 View Profile
 Send PM
we might not be writing about it twenty years later if the show had continued. fan fic is fun, but i think TP's strength is exactly what angel said. always leave em wanting more.

 

New Topic | Post Reply Page 1 of 1 :: << | 1 | >>
Twin Peaks & FWWM > What if they had decided not to reveal laura's killer?


Users viewing this Topic (0)


This page was generated in 141 ms.