Home | Register | Login | Members  

Twin Peaks & FWWM > Little Mike
New Topic | Post Reply
<< | 1 | >>  
1. Friday, February 29, 2008 11:34 AM
giospurs Little Mike


 Member Since
 5/22/2007
 Posts:811

 View Profile
 Send PM

Michael J. Anderson can speak backwards right?

I heard this guy on the radio claiming to do the same thing but he was just saying words as they would be written backwards e.g. Twin Peaks becomes skaep niwt but if you reversed the word Twin Peaks it wouldn't sound like that. So can little Mike speak backwards like a computer would or just how the words are spelt.

 Watching him as Samson in Carnivale has really highlighted what a great actor he is also something that you can't really tell in MD or TP where he is just acting weird, which is probably a lot easier to do.

 
2. Friday, February 29, 2008 7:57 AM
superducky RE:

 Admin
 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:8271

 View Profile
 Send PM

Yes he can. He had stated that he taught himself how to do it. If memory serves me right, he did this before Twin Peaks.

Also, Al Stroebel did it for us at the festival last year.


Kelly

How Do You Live Your Dash?

Check out the Kids' blogs:
The CaleBlog and the Zoe Blog

 
3. Friday, February 29, 2008 8:50 AM
KahlanMnel RE:

 Moderator
 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:13606

 View Profile
 Send PM

Yes, it was something that him and his friends devised way back in the day when he was a youngun. It was a huge coincidence that Lynch wanted to have the backwards speaking in Twin Peaks. When he approached the involved cast members about having to learn their lines backwards, Mike was like "Dude. I'm SO your man" (ok, so I'm paraphrasing there...and giving it my typical California twist) And then he helped the other actors to learn how to say their lines backwards as well.

I had a friend in jr high and high school who could talk backwards. He was a great party trick to pull out at a dull kegger, let me tell you...


~ Amanda

"Just fear me, love me, do as I say and I will be your slave..."

 
4. Friday, February 29, 2008 10:28 AM
giospurs RE:


 Member Since
 5/22/2007
 Posts:811

 View Profile
 Send PM

Sorry, I don't know why there is no thread name, I thought I named it Little Mike.

Anyway, Does anyone know whether he does it by the spelling or he actually does it properly so that if you played it backwards it would sound like the actual words?

 
5. Friday, February 29, 2008 10:52 AM
JVSCant RE:


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:2870

 View Profile
 Send PM
(giospurs, i think if you open your first post for editing and put the title in the subject line, it will magically reappear.)


 
6. Friday, February 29, 2008 11:25 AM
Laura was a patient of mine RE:


 Member Since
 3/15/2006
 Posts:690

 View Profile
 Send PM
It's played backwards in TP, Giospurs, and you can sort of tell what he's saying, so he must be doing it as it would sound. He seems to have got the technique down a little better (or maybe the reversing technology is better) in FWWM, where it's very clear what he's saying...


That god damn trailer's more popular than Uncle's Day in a whorehouse!

 
7. Friday, February 29, 2008 11:34 AM
giospurs RE:


 Member Since
 5/22/2007
 Posts:811

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:It's played backwards in TP, Giospurs, and you can sort of tell what he's saying, so he must be doing it as it would sound. He seems to have got the technique down a little better (or maybe the reversing technology is better) in FWWM, where it's very clear what he's saying...

 Yeah, that's what I thought, but then I thought that they would do it the proper way for TP but when he does it on his own it may not be able to do it the proper way. I don't think doing it by the backwards spelling is very impressive at all it just seems a waste of time to me.

 
8. Friday, February 29, 2008 11:35 AM
giospurs RE:


 Member Since
 5/22/2007
 Posts:811

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:(giospurs, i think if you open your first post for editing and put the title in the subject line, it will magically reappear.)

 

 
9. Friday, February 29, 2008 2:49 PM
3519273540 RE: Little Mike


 Member Since
 4/24/2007
 Posts:91

 View Profile
 Send PM
according to one of the special features things, he breaks the words down into phonemes and then reverses them; properly. he doesn't just read the word as it would sound if the letters were reversed.

 
10. Sunday, March 2, 2008 4:26 PM
giospurs RE: Little Mike


 Member Since
 5/22/2007
 Posts:811

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:according to one of the special features things, he breaks the words down into phonemes and then reverses them; properly. he doesn't just read the word as it would sound if the letters were reversed.

 I just find that astounding. I can't even do that with one phoneme, I find myself going back to the spelling of the word.

 
11. Sunday, March 2, 2008 9:16 PM
geoffr111 RE: Little Mike


 Member Since
 12/20/2005
 Posts:2231

 View Profile
 Send PM

It's easier to do by memory if you use the phonemes because you just think about how the word sounds, not how it is spelled.  So the "peaks" of twin peaks is "peeks," etc.

Skeep newt.  Sounds pretty awesome.  What's even more awesome is that Little Mike can do that in his head so quickly and for so many words in a row.  If I tried to do more than three at a time I'd forget and mess it up.


 
12. Monday, March 3, 2008 6:36 AM
Evenreven RE: Little Mike


 Member Since
 12/5/2006
 Posts:342

 View Profile
 Send PM

Spike Jonze and The Pharcyde had to hire a linguist for the shooting of the classic "Drop" music video (which uses the same technique or double reversal). It was too much work for them to work out the phonemes on their own. Here it is .

And before you accuse Jonze of plagiarism, the technique is older than Twin Peaks. It goes at least back to the group The United States of America's brilliant "Osamu's birthday" from 1968, and can probably be traced to even earlier tape experiments.


"What credit card do you want to put that on?"
"Caash, prease."

tojamura

 

New Topic | Post Reply Page 1 of 1 :: << | 1 | >>
Twin Peaks & FWWM > Little Mike


Users viewing this Topic (0)


This page was generated in 125 ms.