Home | Register | Login | Members  

David Lynch > old is the new new
New Topic | Post Reply
<< | 1 | >>  
1. Thursday, December 7, 2006 9:36 AM
hatter old is the new new


 Member Since
 11/12/2006
 Posts:55

 View Profile
 Send PM
Having seen countless interviews with David Lynch over the years it seems to me that if you have seen one interview with him you need not really watch another with him as he has the same things to say in them all, even though the warmth of his personality shines through. Does anyone else feel the same way about his interviews?.

 
2. Thursday, December 7, 2006 10:14 AM
LetsRoque RE: old is the new new


 Member Since
 1/2/2006
 Posts:922

 View Profile
 Send PM
Interviews are beautiful things


'I look for an opening, do you understand?'
 
3. Thursday, December 7, 2006 10:50 AM
nuart RE: old is the new new


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

Well, you go fishing for ideas and sometimes one bites.

(Inhale. Blow out smoke ring.)

I used to be angry. 

Susan


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
4. Thursday, December 7, 2006 11:09 AM
nuart RE: old is the new new


 Member Since
 12/18/2005
 Posts:7632

 View Profile
 Send PM

To be fair, the same is true of almost anyone who's been interviewed over and over and over.  They become accustomed to repeating the same stories and themes.  If you follow any artist closely, chances are you're going to have that same sense.  Keeping in mind that most journalists are not intimates of the person they're interviewing, the interviewee is only going to reveal so much. 

You saw what happened this week with Gwyneth Paltrow when her interview in Spanish made the headlines.  

Wariness has got to be part of the equation when dealing with the press.

Susan 

 

 


     
“Half a truth is often a great lie.”

 

Ben Franklin

 
5. Thursday, December 7, 2006 1:26 PM
hatter RE: old is the new new


 Member Since
 11/12/2006
 Posts:55

 View Profile
 Send PM
Good points made. I understand Lynch being wary of the press, but  I get the feeling that the guy is so savvy dealing with questions that it comes across that he can can almost reduce any question ( the ones that  he doesn't want to deal with anyway  ) to a stock answer that he has preprepared, he obviously knows the sort of questions people are going to field him when dealing with with the majority of his work . One case in point that never fails to bug me is when he is asked how he arrived at creating a certain character or scene  , he invariably says "ideas" which is  really avoiding the question as it could apply to making a sandwich or anything which passes through a humans brain.

 
6. Friday, December 8, 2006 4:39 AM
RazorBlade RE: old is the new new


 Member Since
 9/10/2006
 Posts:94

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

Well, you go fishing for ideas and sometimes one bites.

(Inhale. Blow out smoke ring.)

I used to be angry. 

Susan


 I dig it, baby. I think anyone evolves over time. Sometimes they may be more guarded, sometimes not. Even when they are guarded you can still find something in what they say.


We kissed Buffy. I may be love's bitch but I'm man enough to admit it.
 
7. Saturday, December 9, 2006 10:59 PM
stillair RE: old is the new new


 Member Since
 3/14/2006
 Posts:49

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE: it seems to me that if you have seen one interview with him you need not really watch another with him


 This is  true to a certain degree. I think his behaviour towards the media in general has become more reserved after the year 1992. I don´t know if he does this intentionally (and I don´t care anways), but his presence seems "iconic" and static sometimes unless he trusts the interviewers or the questions are more thrilling.

It´s telling that he frequently gets asked "Is it true that you kept a shaved mouse in your freezer 20 years ago?" and the interviewer of course knows the answer and simply wants Lynch "to talk Lynchian".

 
8. Saturday, December 9, 2006 11:17 PM
dugpa RE: old is the new new


 Member Since
 12/28/2005
 Posts:271

 View Profile
 Send PM

It's all in the questions. It seems that he gets asked the same questions over and over. I remember in the chat room when it first opened up I was able to get some questions answered that were pretty awesome. I wish I saved the transcripts as I don't believe they were ever posted.

 

 
9. Sunday, December 10, 2006 8:03 AM
luuk RE: old is the new new


 Member Since
 12/28/2005
 Posts:121

 View Profile
 Send PM

Yeah. And how about the story about a painting starting to move. Ever heard Lynch talk about that one? ;)

I'm getting kinda bored of this. Sure Dave is unwilling to share a lot but I think the reporters are more to blame. They always ask the same questions as if they hadn't done their homework at all. They either ask something that all the fans are more than familiar with, or then something that has to do with Lynch's own interpretations of his films, which we know he won't tell us. That's only natural, I don't like to talk about my films a lot either. It's better to find out by oneself. If that's impossible, then the answer is not earned. However, there are lots of questions to ask that are of neither of these two groups.

For example, regarding casting Jeremy Irons to Inland Empire: my favourite role from mr. Irons is his performance as Humbert Humbert in Adrian Lyne's Lolita (1997). Lynch always says that doing the later Lolita was rather blasphemous (as Kubrick's Lolita is one of his all-time favourites) and he refused even to watch it. Has he still not seen it and where did that casting decision come from?

 
10. Sunday, December 10, 2006 11:04 AM
mr. silencio RE: old is the new new


 Member Since
 12/20/2005
 Posts:1466

 View Profile
 Send PM

Kubrick's Lolita is incomparable to Adrian Line's film, but they're both good films. For example, Dominique Swain respects much moren than Sue Lyon the resemblance with Lola's character because, of course, the film was made nowadays and there were less restrictions regarding her minor age. I use to not like Jeremy Irons very much in that movie, but I have to admit he's one of the greatest actors in the modern history of cinema and his performance in Dead ringers is his best ever!

Regarding Lynch not wanting to see Lolita it seems reasonable, since he probably never sees any movie at all! If he chose Irons he didn't need to see it to know he's one of the best actors in Hollywood. And we also know he probably doesn't even like to put them on the acting test during their first meetings a.k.a. auditions.

The interviews, yeah well they always don't add nothing more than what's just been said already with the movie. This is a general law regarding any kind of people, especially actors. They're good at acting, but terrible when they have to deal with the press (usually they end up telling more about themselves than something about them actually).

 Lynch is elusive and definitely likes to make fun of journalists and critics. When he told that it's wonderful that so much people had different interpretations for Mulholland Dr. it was an obvious joke. Of course it is open to many different views and perspectives, but the story and the meaning is only one... And he'll never reveal it to you!


"Did they scoff the whole damn Smörgåsbord?" (Audrey) 

"Gimme a donut!" (Coop)

 
11. Sunday, December 10, 2006 5:51 PM
stillair RE: old is the new new


 Member Since
 3/14/2006
 Posts:49

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

The interviews, yeah well they always don't add nothing more than what's just been said already with the movie. This is a general law regarding any kind of people, especially actors. They're good at acting, but terrible when they have to deal with the press (usually they end up telling more about themselves than something about them actually).

 


 Depends on the circumstances. Usually, in the wake of promoting a film, certain (negative) things tend to be left unsaid, simply because cast and crew are contractually obliged to do a certain amount of interviews and not to trash the film. (That´s why retrospective audio commentaries can be so intriguing, I´m having Jereym Irons´ commentary for Dead Ringers in mind where he talks about de Niro turning the role down if the role wasn´t changed from gynaecologist to lawyer.)

Very often journalists receive a list of dos and don´ts in advance, so they know which subjects not to touch. (According to a Cronenberg interview, there´s even an on-set codex for certain films for cast and crew with topics to be avoided in jokes...)

So, it´s hardly surprising that interviews are more often playing by rules than openminded discussions.

 
12. Wednesday, December 13, 2006 12:56 AM
12rainbow RE: old is the new new


 Member Since
 12/19/2005
 Posts:4953

 View Profile
 Send PM

Jeremy Irons plays a great dirty (yet sensitive) old man, and I think he did great justice to Humbert as he was written.

I own Lolita on audio, read by Irons.  Absolutely perfect.  

 
13. Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:35 AM
luuk RE: old is the new new


 Member Since
 12/28/2005
 Posts:121

 View Profile
 Send PM
QUOTE:

I own Lolita on audio, read by Irons.  Absolutely perfect.  


Whoa. Must be a thrill!

 

New Topic | Post Reply Page 1 of 1 :: << | 1 | >>
David Lynch > old is the new new


Users viewing this Topic (0)


This page was generated in 125 ms.