 |
|
|
|
|
|
David Lynch
> Lynch and Brechtian alienation
|
|
New Topic |
Post Reply
|
<< |
1 |
>>
| 1. Tuesday, October 3, 2006 12:43 AM |
| MrsTremond |
Lynch and Brechtian alienation |
Member Since 12/20/2005 Posts:171
View Profile Send PM
|
Bertolt Brecht was a German theatre director who developed the theory of Epic Theatre. I will focus on one aspect of its many compenents; the concept of ALIENATION. What Brecht desired was to make the audience AWARE of the theatricality of the performance; he would make lighting devices visible, set changes visible, elements of artifice in set design, etc. In terms other than set design...he would transform a scene of otherwise ordinary proportions and present it in such a way that it became so STRANGE that the audience had to think twice and wonder about it. The plot is not strange, in fact NOTHING truly is, but somehow it would have an aura of STRANGENESS. By doing this, the spectators would have to examine the scene differently and think about its meaning consciously. Hopefully, Brecht felt, they would enact change in accordance with their conclusions.
Perhaps Lynch is not a surrealist. That is not to say he has no surrealistic elements in his work. In particular, take Mulholland Drive. Apart from the blue box, the silencio scene, and the midget old people, most of what occurs could HAPPEN. They seem "ordinary" so to speak, in that they are possible and REALISTIC. But they evoke a feeling of the absurd in us, the viewers. Something is wrong, off kilter, but we're not sure what. Lynch's direction somehow transforms the ordinary into the strange. THis is also particularly true in Twin Peaks.
Does Brecht's alienation manifest itself through some works of Lynch? Thoughts?
This would look good on your wall. -Noah-
|
| 2. Tuesday, October 3, 2006 8:52 PM |
| ig0r |
RE: Lynch and Brechtian alienation |
Member Since 1/25/2006 Posts:208
View Profile Send PM
|
I don't think Lynch's movies deal with things that "could happen", so to speak, in the way you mean it. It is to me a sort of other realm. Lynch just displays subjectivity, and you could say that the events in his films COULD HAPPEN because anything can really happen subjectively (the REALITY of ideas). In a sense, by definition Lynch can be considered surrealist whether he liked it or not just because it is automatism. But on the other hand, what does surrealism even mean nowadays, I mean it's just a word. This method of automatism is an innate function of the human being, Breton just defined it as surrealism, but that doesn't mean there has been no surrealism (by definition) from the beginning of humanity up to modernism. I see Brechtian alienation as an element of realism, and I would say for example Bergman certainly uses it quite a bit. But Lynch I would say falls into the side of subjective expressionism of abstract perceptions of the mind.
|
| 3. Thursday, October 19, 2006 7:23 PM |
| Fred |
RE: Lynch and Brechtian alienation |
Member Since 8/23/2006 Posts:259
View Profile Send PM
|
I think Twin Peaks does make us aware of theatricality of the TV programme or film at certain times. Look at the Red Room sequences. The red curtains make us think of a theatre and the perfectly flat floor with the zigzag pattern is like a stage. A spotlight often appears on certain characters, usually the Lodge spirits, eg, when the curtains appear in Glastonbury Grove, or when Jimmy Scott sings "Sycamore Trees". These are the occasions when Twin Peaks reminds us we are just watching a TV show, which is not really that different from a play. We should not be surprised when the impossible happens, because none of this is real anyway!
|
| 4. Friday, October 20, 2006 2:36 AM |
| stillair |
RE: Lynch and Brechtian alienation |
Member Since 3/14/2006 Posts:49
View Profile Send PM
|
Sorry, but you are completely on a wrong track. Brecht is about politics and destroying all potential emotional involvement with the depicted world ("Glotzt nicht so romantisch"). Lynch is the best possible opposite imaginable, call him a romanticist if you will.
|
| 5. Friday, October 20, 2006 11:34 AM |
| MrsTremond |
RE: Lynch and Brechtian alienation |
Member Since 12/20/2005 Posts:171
View Profile Send PM
|
i was not drawing parallels between Lynch and Brecht's overall philosophy, simply the concept of alienation.
This would look good on your wall. -Noah-
|
| 6. Friday, October 20, 2006 3:49 PM |
| Fred |
RE: Lynch and Brechtian alienation |
Member Since 8/23/2006 Posts:259
View Profile Send PM
|
As far as I know, there is no direct political message in Lynch's films, TV, paintings, etc, and there are not political statements. But I think he may still use alienation effect sometimes. Perhaps the dream sequences are examples of a character stepping out of his life and looking at his situation, his relationship with other characters. In Mulholland Drive, Diane Selwyn re-imagines her entire life so that it is better. In Lost Highway, Fred Madison creates an alternative reality in his mind, in which he is younger and his wife is replaced by a similar woman. These are just a few examples. Perhaps in episode 29, Cooper goes into the Black Lodge, effectively stepping out of and being alienated from reality for a short time, and he is forced by the Black Lodge to re-examine specific events from his past life, eg, Windom Earle's murder of Caroline and stabbing of Cooper. He even looks down on the floor and sees himself! Could these be examples of alienation?
|
|
New Topic |
Post Reply
|
Page 1 of 1 ::
<< |
1 |
>>
|
|
David Lynch
> Lynch and Brechtian alienation
|
| Users viewing this Topic (0) |
| |
Powered by JorkelBB 2006 (Version 1.0b)
|
|
|