|
Just wondering if there are any takers here... I was watching Mulholland Drive a few weeks ago (for the umpteenth time) and had the ten clues written on a post it inside the DVD case. I decided to try and look at them again with a fresh perspective, forgetting all of my preconceived notions and the preconceived notions of others (easier said than done, btw) with regard to analysis. With regard to the clues that appear before the opening credits, someone, somewhere once mentioned the white stuff on the bed next to where the camera POV lays down (talking prior to credits here), and I realized that is was the outline of Betty and the two old folks. Scanning back I looked at that picture again, of Betty and the two, some say parents, others grandparents (irrelevant right now) that flank her just between the jitterbug contest and the bedroom "we lay down" shot. It struck me that I was looking at a 3-headed person. Not three people. Freud whispers in my ear and Id, Ego, and Super-Ego pop into my head. One person, three psychological aspects. Stay with me here...two women and one man (Betty & the couple, and Watts/Harring/Theroux). Id, Ego, and Super-Ego. So I thought about watching the film with the Freudian concept of the psyche filter sprinkled with some Jungian dream stuff and some eastern philosophies... OF PARTICULAR NOTE: Pay attention to the times when the camera is tight on the eyes (ie the shot is of the eyes and the forehead and bridge of nose only) between Watts and Harring a few times, and between Watts and Theroux when she is brought from the audition to the set. Seems to me these shots are saying that these are one and the same person. Gonna watch to see if this occurs between Harring and Theroux. Bear with me as I haven't really watched it yet with this filter on. I was wondering if anyone else would like to try this out with me, or if anyone has ever heard a theory with this basis. According to Freud the role of: Ego: serves as the organized conscious mediator between the person and reality, especially by functioning both in the perception of and adaptation to reality. (Watts?) Super-Ego: division of the psyche that is only PARTLY conscious, represents internalization of parental conscious (right & wrong as taught by parents) and the rules of society; and functions to reward and punish through a system of moral attitudes, conscience, and sense of guilt. (Harring?) Id: Completely unconscious and is source of psychic energy derived from instinctual needs and drives; it seeks alternative expressions for perceived evil/immoral impulses; also Freud called it the dark, inaccessible part. (Theroux?) ALSO Defense Mechanisms functioning as other characters: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_mechanism Several, insert appropriate character where it fits. Then there's all the other goodies like Michael Andersons character (shut it down=die), and Cookie, etc. The seedy hotel and other places being where the Id tries to hide from the death angel(s)... Just watch the film with the idea that all of this takes place in the mind of one person, and is about one person facing their death. The whole thing being a death dream between the gunshot and the actual death. Seems that Harring and Theroux eventually come to accept the death (ie sold out) while Watts refuses to accept it. Its all just a theory and I am hoping there are a few of you that would like to watch the film with this filter in mind. I'll be watching it within the next day or two and would love to see what others thought with regard to this theory. It is imperative that you forget all other theories, interpretations, and preconceived notions and watch it afresh. I could be way off here, but it is intriguing enough for me to try it out. Hope to see your thoughts here... 
PS: "Camilla and I are going to be." Period, not ...married, not anything, just "going to be." Like this whole thing fits with the notion of the Rabbits living room being a limbo between this life and the next.
"Every day is a Saturday morning." -DL
|